Israel vs Mozambique: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Israel
- Mozambique
How they compare
Israel currently reports 10.66 million current US$ against 9.71 million current US$ in Mozambique, a difference of 945,700 current US$.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 81st and Mozambique ranks 84th of 168 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.47 million current US$ | 18.53 million current US$ | 16.06 million current US$ | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 7.97 million current US$ | 54.55 million current US$ | 46.59 million current US$ | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Israel or Mozambique?
- Israel, at 10.66 million current US$ against 9.71 million current US$ in Mozambique as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Israel and Mozambique?
- 945,700 current US$, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1996.
- How do Israel and Mozambique rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Israel ranks 81st and Mozambique ranks 84th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.