Kiribati vs Samoa: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Kiribati
4,984 current US$
in 2020
Samoa
5,913 current US$
in 2021
Kiribati rank
157th
Samoa rank
156th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 5,913 current US$ against 4,984 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 929 current US$.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Samoa ahead.
Kiribati ranks 157th and Samoa ranks 156th of 168 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,500 current US$ | 170,000 current US$ | 157,500 current US$ | Samoa |
| 2000s | 40,000 current US$ | 61,000 current US$ | 21,000 current US$ | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 5,913 current US$ against 4,984 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 929 current US$, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2004.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Kiribati ranks 157th and Samoa ranks 156th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.