Korea vs Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps
Korea
9.74 million current US$
in 1999
Libya
7.25 million current US$
in 2023
Korea rank
83rd
Libya rank
86th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France … France gaps over time
- Korea
- Libya
How they compare
Korea currently reports 9.74 million current US$ against 7.25 million current US$ in Libya, a difference of 2.49 million current US$.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Libya ahead.
Korea ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 86th of 168 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.66 million current US$ | 1.18 million current US$ | 1.48 million current US$ | Korea |
| 1990s | 7.29 million current US$ | 776,000 current US$ | 6.52 million current US$ | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Korea or Libya?
- Korea, at 9.74 million current US$ against 7.25 million current US$ in Libya as of 1999.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Korea and Libya?
- 2.49 million current US$, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Libya?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1999.
- How do Korea and Libya rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Korea ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 86th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.