Latvia vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.98 million current US$ against 1.62 million current US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 356,010 current US$.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Latvia ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 117th of 168 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 956,250 current US$ | 11.04 million current US$ | 10.09 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 1.80 million current US$ | 19.71 million current US$ | 17.92 million current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Latvia, at 1.98 million current US$ against 1.62 million current US$ in Nicaragua as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 356,010 current US$, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 116th and Nicaragua ranks 117th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.