Malawi vs Singapore: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Malawi
2.22 million current US$
in 2023
Singapore
2.31 million current US$
in 1995
Malawi rank
109th
Singapore rank
106th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Malawi
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 2.31 million current US$ against 2.22 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 92,890 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Singapore ahead.
Malawi ranks 109th and Singapore ranks 106th of 168 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.18 million current US$ | 2.25 million current US$ | 935,000 current US$ | Malawi |
| 1990s | 7.37 million current US$ | 2.84 million current US$ | 4.53 million current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Malawi or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 2.31 million current US$ against 2.22 million current US$ in Malawi as of 1995.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Malawi and Singapore?
- 92,890 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Singapore?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1995.
- How do Malawi and Singapore rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Malawi ranks 109th and Singapore ranks 106th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.