Malta vs Turkmenistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Malta
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 374,376 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 44,376 current US$.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 141st and Turkmenistan ranks 139th of 168 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 150,000 current US$ | 215,000 current US$ | 65,000 current US$ | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 240,000 current US$ | 300,000 current US$ | 60,000 current US$ | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Malta or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 374,376 current US$ against 330,000 current US$ in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Malta and Turkmenistan?
- 44,376 current US$, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Turkmenistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2002.
- How do Malta and Turkmenistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Malta ranks 141st and Turkmenistan ranks 139th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.