Qatar vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Qatar
1.19 million current US$
in 1995
Zambia
1.17 million current US$
in 2023
Qatar rank
124th
Zambia rank
125th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Qatar
- Zambia
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1.19 million current US$ against 1.17 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 19,310 current US$.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 124th and Zambia ranks 125th of 168 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 457,000 current US$ | 1.32 million current US$ | 864,000 current US$ | Zambia |
| 1990s | 765,000 current US$ | 14.97 million current US$ | 14.21 million current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Qatar or Zambia?
- Qatar, at 1.19 million current US$ against 1.17 million current US$ in Zambia as of 1995.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Qatar and Zambia?
- 19,310 current US$, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1995.
- How do Qatar and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Qatar ranks 124th and Zambia ranks 125th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.