Romania vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Romania
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 46.92 million current US$ against 42.10 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 4.82 million current US$.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tunisia ahead.
Romania ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 42nd of 168 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.25 million current US$ | 81.41 million current US$ | 58.16 million current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 27.62 million current US$ | 105.19 million current US$ | 77.57 million current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Romania or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 46.92 million current US$ against 42.10 million current US$ in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Romania and Tunisia?
- 4.82 million current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Romania and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Romania ranks 43rd and Tunisia ranks 42nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.