Slovakia vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps over time
- Slovakia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 6.71 million current US$ against 6.26 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 445,570 current US$.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Slovakia ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 168 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovakia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.72 million current US$ | 6.66 million current US$ | 2.94 million current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 4.45 million current US$ | 3.34 million current US$ | 1.11 million current US$ | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps, Slovakia or Zimbabwe?
- Slovakia, at 6.71 million current US$ against 6.26 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps between Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 445,570 current US$, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Slovakia and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), gaps?
- Slovakia ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) with 100 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.