Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per

Singapore
3,448 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1995
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
133.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore rank
9th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
6th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per over time

  • Singapore
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
02.0k4.0k6.0k197019962022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 3,448 current US$ per square kilometre against 133.03 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 3,315 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 25.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 6th of 167 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1980s 3,355 current US$ per square kilometre 57.96 current US$ per square kilometre 3,297 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 4,239 current US$ per square kilometre 123.62 current US$ per square kilometre 4,115 current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per, Singapore or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Singapore, at 3,448 current US$ per square kilometre against 133.03 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 1995.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per between Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
3,315 current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
16 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 1995.
How do Singapore and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
Singapore ranks 9th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 6th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-square-kilometre/singapore/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Singapore vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
214 places, 9,160 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.