Congo vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per

Congo
0.0063 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Least developed countries
0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Congo rank
10th
Least developed countries rank
9th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per over time

  • Congo
  • Least developed countries
00.050.10.15196419932023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0063 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.005 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo's figure about 4.7 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 9th of 166 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0358 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0036 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0322 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
1980s 0.0278 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0059 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0219 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
1990s 0.0528 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0075 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0453 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2000s 0.0237 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0039 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0198 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2010s 0.0094 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.008 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo
2020s 0.0052 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0037 current US$ per US$ of GDP Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per, Congo or Least developed countries?
Congo, at 0.0063 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per between Congo and Least developed countries?
0.005 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Least developed countries?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Congo and Least developed countries rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
Congo ranks 10th and Least developed countries ranks 9th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-rep/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Congo vs Least developed countries: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 8,959 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.