China vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France

China
-48.60 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname
-1.37 million current US$
in 2023
China rank
168th
Suriname rank
165th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France over time

  • China
  • Suriname
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M198020012023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports -1.37 million current US$ against -48.60 million current US$ in China, a difference of 47.23 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1981 it was China ahead.

China ranks 168th and Suriname ranks 165th of 168 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Suriname Difference Ahead
1980s 43.63 million current US$ 91,111 current US$ 43.54 million current US$ China
1990s 89.45 million current US$ 193,000 current US$ 89.25 million current US$ China
2000s 131.52 million current US$ 1.35 million current US$ 130.17 million current US$ China
2010s 136.30 million current US$ 4.43 million current US$ 131.86 million current US$ China
2020s -48.60 million current US$ 894,975 current US$ 49.49 million current US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france, China or Suriname?
Suriname, at -1.37 million current US$ against -48.60 million current US$ in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france between China and Suriname?
47.23 million current US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Suriname?
40 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2020.
How do China and Suriname rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france?
China ranks 168th and Suriname ranks 165th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us/china/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us/china/suriname/">China vs Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
215 places, 9,265 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.