Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$)

Slovenia
56.72 % change on previous year
in 2002
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
-19.75 % change on previous year
in 2022
Slovenia rank
34th
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
33rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) over time

  • Slovenia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
-2000200400600800197119962022

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 56.72 % change on previous year against -19.75 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 76.47 % change on previous year.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 2.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 171 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1990s 227.33 % change on previous year -6.39 % change on previous year 233.71 % change on previous year Slovenia
2000s -116.59 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year 118.61 % change on previous year Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), Slovenia or Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
Slovenia, at 56.72 % change on previous year against -19.75 % change on previous year in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2002.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$) between Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
76.47 % change on previous year, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)?
6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
How do Slovenia and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$)?
Slovenia ranks 34th and Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-annual-growth-rate/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-annual-growth-rate/slovenia/sub-saharan-africa-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Slovenia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 9,843 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.