Belize vs Macao: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany … Germany gaps
Belize
17,932 current US$
in 2023
Macao
20,000 current US$
in 1993
Belize rank
154th
Macao rank
152nd
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany … Germany gaps over time
- Belize
- Macao
How they compare
Macao currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 17,932 current US$ in Belize, a difference of 2,068 current US$.
That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 154th and Macao ranks 152nd of 174 countries.
Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 46,000 current US$ | 32,000 current US$ | 14,000 current US$ | Belize |
| 1990s | 92,500 current US$ | 17,500 current US$ | 75,000 current US$ | Belize |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Belize or Macao?
- Macao, at 20,000 current US$ against 17,932 current US$ in Belize as of 1993.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Belize and Macao?
- 2,068 current US$, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Macao?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1993.
- How do Belize and Macao rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Belize ranks 154th and Macao ranks 152nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.