Brazil vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps

Brazil
100.85 million current US$
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
975.55 million current US$
in 2022
Brazil rank
32nd
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
31st

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time

  • Brazil
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196019912023

How they compare

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) currently reports 975.55 million current US$ against 100.85 million current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 874.70 million current US$.

That makes South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s figure about 9.7 times Brazil's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 32nd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st of 174 countries.

South Asia (IDA & IBRD) has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1970s 26.71 million current US$ 176.84 million current US$ 150.14 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1980s 57.00 million current US$ 295.23 million current US$ 238.22 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
1990s 42.56 million current US$ 318.56 million current US$ 276.00 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2000s 77.17 million current US$ 356.61 million current US$ 279.45 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 210.25 million current US$ 1.14 billion current US$ 934.51 million current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
2020s 172.50 million current US$ 1.37 billion current US$ 1.20 billion current US$ South Asia (IDA & IBRD)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Brazil or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
South Asia (IDA & IBRD), at 975.55 million current US$ against 100.85 million current US$ in Brazil as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Brazil and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
874.70 million current US$, with South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Brazil and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
Brazil ranks 32nd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 31st of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/brazil/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Brazil vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 10,586 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.