Chile vs Kosovo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time
- Chile
- Kosovo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 24.63 million current US$ against 23.31 million current US$ in Kosovo, a difference of 1.32 million current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo ahead.
Chile ranks 72nd and Kosovo ranks 75th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.52 million current US$ | 32.55 million current US$ | 21.03 million current US$ | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 63.91 million current US$ | 39.09 million current US$ | 24.82 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Chile or Kosovo?
- Chile, at 24.63 million current US$ against 23.31 million current US$ in Kosovo as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Chile and Kosovo?
- 1.32 million current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kosovo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Kosovo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 72nd and Kosovo ranks 75th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.