China vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps

China
216.65 million current US$
in 2023
IDA only
4.09 billion current US$
in 2022
China rank
12th
IDA only rank
10th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time

  • China
  • IDA only
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B197019962023

How they compare

IDA only currently reports 4.09 billion current US$ against 216.65 million current US$ in China, a difference of 3.87 billion current US$.

That makes IDA only's figure about 18.9 times China's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, IDA only has been ahead every year.

China ranks 12th and IDA only ranks 10th of 174 countries.

IDA only has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 1.34 million current US$ 752.82 million current US$ 751.48 million current US$ IDA only
1980s 56.46 million current US$ 835.53 million current US$ 779.07 million current US$ IDA only
1990s 322.96 million current US$ 1.26 billion current US$ 940.33 million current US$ IDA only
2000s 248.11 million current US$ 1.37 billion current US$ 1.12 billion current US$ IDA only
2010s 458.54 million current US$ 2.82 billion current US$ 2.36 billion current US$ IDA only
2020s 382.43 million current US$ 4.50 billion current US$ 4.12 billion current US$ IDA only

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, China or IDA only?
IDA only, at 4.09 billion current US$ against 216.65 million current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between China and IDA only?
3.87 billion current US$, with IDA only ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and IDA only?
44 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2022.
How do China and IDA only rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
China ranks 12th and IDA only ranks 10th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/china/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/china/ida-only/">China vs IDA only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 10,586 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.