Cyprus vs Tuvalu: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps
Cyprus
-380,000 current US$
in 1996
Tuvalu
7,198 current US$
in 2016
Cyprus rank
164th
Tuvalu rank
161st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time
- Cyprus
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 7,198 current US$ against -380,000 current US$ in Cyprus, a difference of 387,198 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 161st of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.04 million current US$ | 35,000 current US$ | 2.01 million current US$ | Cyprus |
| 1990s | 37,143 current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | 62,857 current US$ | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Cyprus or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 7,198 current US$ against -380,000 current US$ in Cyprus as of 2016.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Cyprus and Tuvalu?
- 387,198 current US$, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Tuvalu?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1996.
- How do Cyprus and Tuvalu rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Cyprus ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 161st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.