East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps

East Asia & Pacific
604.37 million current US$
in 2023
Rwanda
77.20 million current US$
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
35th
Rwanda rank
38th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Rwanda
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B196019912023

How they compare

East Asia & Pacific currently reports 604.37 million current US$ against 77.20 million current US$ in Rwanda, a difference of 527.17 million current US$.

That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 7.8 times Rwanda's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 45 groups.

East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 34.95 million current US$ 452,500 current US$ 34.50 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1970s 99.51 million current US$ 6.51 million current US$ 93.00 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1980s 305.11 million current US$ 22.21 million current US$ 282.90 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
1990s 669.48 million current US$ 36.36 million current US$ 633.12 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2000s 496.63 million current US$ 19.90 million current US$ 476.73 million current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2010s 1.05 billion current US$ 40.26 million current US$ 1.01 billion current US$ East Asia & Pacific
2020s 1.13 billion current US$ 75.09 million current US$ 1.05 billion current US$ East Asia & Pacific

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, East Asia & Pacific or Rwanda?
East Asia & Pacific, at 604.37 million current US$ against 77.20 million current US$ in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda?
527.17 million current US$, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Rwanda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 38th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/east-asia-and-pacific/rwanda/">East Asia & Pacific vs Rwanda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 10,586 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.