Georgia vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time
- Georgia
- Latvia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 8.24 million current US$ against 5.99 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 2.25 million current US$.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 174 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.71 million current US$ | 9.39 million current US$ | 7.31 million current US$ | Georgia |
| 2000s | 30.07 million current US$ | 5.19 million current US$ | 24.88 million current US$ | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Georgia or Latvia?
- Georgia, at 8.24 million current US$ against 5.99 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Georgia and Latvia?
- 2.25 million current US$, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2004.
- How do Georgia and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Georgia ranks 93rd and Latvia ranks 95th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.