Haiti vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time
- Haiti
- Lithuania
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 10.76 million current US$ against 9.75 million current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 1.01 million current US$.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 91st and Lithuania ranks 92nd of 174 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.22 million current US$ | 14.83 million current US$ | 9.62 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 4.76 million current US$ | 7.45 million current US$ | 2.69 million current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Haiti or Lithuania?
- Haiti, at 10.76 million current US$ against 9.75 million current US$ in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Haiti and Lithuania?
- 1.01 million current US$, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Lithuania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Haiti and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Haiti ranks 91st and Lithuania ranks 92nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.