Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps

Hong Kong, China
1.57 million current US$
in 1996
Saudi Arabia
1.53 million current US$
in 2007
Hong Kong, China rank
114th
Saudi Arabia rank
115th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Saudi Arabia
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196219842007

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.57 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 40,000 current US$.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 114th and Saudi Arabia ranks 115th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 829,286 current US$ 42,857 current US$ 786,429 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1970s 949,000 current US$ 388,000 current US$ 561,000 current US$ Hong Kong, China
1980s 1.75 million current US$ 3.58 million current US$ 1.84 million current US$ Saudi Arabia
1990s 1.79 million current US$ 1.57 million current US$ 214,286 current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Hong Kong, China or Saudi Arabia?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.57 million current US$ against 1.53 million current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia?
40,000 current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
Hong Kong, China ranks 114th and Saudi Arabia ranks 115th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-gaps-filled/hong-kong-sar-china/saudi-arabia/">Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
221 places, 10,586 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.