Latvia vs Lithuania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 9.75 million current US$ against 5.99 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 3.76 million current US$.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.6 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lithuania ahead.
Latvia ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 92nd of 174 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.15 million current US$ | 14.83 million current US$ | 6.68 million current US$ | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 5.19 million current US$ | 7.45 million current US$ | 2.26 million current US$ | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 9.75 million current US$ against 5.99 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 3.76 million current US$, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2004.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Latvia ranks 95th and Lithuania ranks 92nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.