Egypt vs Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Egypt
-164.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
-57.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
166th
Jamaica rank
164th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Egypt
  • Jamaica
-2.0k02.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports -57.15 current US$ per square kilometre against -164.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 107.11 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 166th and Jamaica ranks 164th of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Jamaica in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 7.25 current US$ per square kilometre 13.59 current US$ per square kilometre 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 53.27 current US$ per square kilometre 178.67 current US$ per square kilometre 125.4 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 122.44 current US$ per square kilometre 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre 1,046 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 288.77 current US$ per square kilometre 196.77 current US$ per square kilometre 92 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 115.71 current US$ per square kilometre -568.05 current US$ per square kilometre 683.76 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 130.35 current US$ per square kilometre -261.18 current US$ per square kilometre 391.53 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s -79.75 current US$ per square kilometre -60 current US$ per square kilometre 19.75 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Egypt or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at -57.15 current US$ per square kilometre against -164.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Egypt and Jamaica?
107.11 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jamaica?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Jamaica rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Egypt ranks 166th and Jamaica ranks 164th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/jamaica/">Egypt vs Jamaica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.