Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
132.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Macau, China
1,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1993
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
19th
Macau, China rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Macau, China
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962022

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 132.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 867.64 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 7.6 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 19th and Macau, China ranks 19th of 45 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 45.77 current US$ per square kilometre 1,500 current US$ per square kilometre 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 74.71 current US$ per square kilometre 833.33 current US$ per square kilometre 758.63 current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre against 132.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 1993.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Macau, China?
867.64 current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Macau, China?
7 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1993.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Macau, China rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 19th and Macau, China ranks 19th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/macao-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Macau, China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.