Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Hong Kong, China
1,495 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1996
Lower middle income
172.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
13th
Lower middle income rank
16th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Lower middle income
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1,495 current US$ per square kilometre against 172.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income, a difference of 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 8.7 times Lower middle income's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Lower middle income ranks 16th of 171 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Lower middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 656.86 current US$ per square kilometre 9.55 current US$ per square kilometre 647.31 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 939.16 current US$ per square kilometre 25.21 current US$ per square kilometre 913.95 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 1,760 current US$ per square kilometre 52.64 current US$ per square kilometre 1,707 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 1,774 current US$ per square kilometre 95.98 current US$ per square kilometre 1,678 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Hong Kong, China or Lower middle income?
Hong Kong, China, at 1,495 current US$ per square kilometre against 172.53 current US$ per square kilometre in Lower middle income as of 1996.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
1,322 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income?
33 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 1996.
How do Hong Kong, China and Lower middle income rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 13th and Lower middle income ranks 16th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/lower-middle-income/">Hong Kong, China vs Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.