IBRD only vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

IBRD only
99.66 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Senegal
728.5 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
26th
Senegal rank
23rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • IBRD only
  • Senegal
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 728.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 99.66 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 628.84 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 7.3 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IBRD only ahead.

IBRD only ranks 26th and Senegal ranks 23rd of 45 groups.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 9.16 current US$ per square kilometre 23.4 current US$ per square kilometre 14.24 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1980s 20.88 current US$ per square kilometre 88.32 current US$ per square kilometre 67.45 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 50.8 current US$ per square kilometre 159.24 current US$ per square kilometre 108.43 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 33.82 current US$ per square kilometre 128.01 current US$ per square kilometre 94.18 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2010s 57.95 current US$ per square kilometre 141.94 current US$ per square kilometre 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2020s 86.22 current US$ per square kilometre 589.62 current US$ per square kilometre 503.4 current US$ per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, IBRD only or Senegal?
Senegal, at 728.5 current US$ per square kilometre against 99.66 current US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between IBRD only and Senegal?
628.84 current US$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Senegal?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do IBRD only and Senegal rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
IBRD only ranks 26th and Senegal ranks 23rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/senegal/">IBRD only vs Senegal: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.