Jamaica vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Jamaica
-57.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
-18.96 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
164th
Pakistan rank
162nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Pakistan
-2.0k02.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports -18.96 current US$ per square kilometre against -57.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 38.19 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Pakistan ahead.

Jamaica ranks 164th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 171 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 13.59 current US$ per square kilometre 38.62 current US$ per square kilometre 25.04 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1970s 178.67 current US$ per square kilometre 48.25 current US$ per square kilometre 130.42 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 1,168 current US$ per square kilometre 62.72 current US$ per square kilometre 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 196.77 current US$ per square kilometre 62.39 current US$ per square kilometre 134.38 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s -568.05 current US$ per square kilometre 60.57 current US$ per square kilometre 628.63 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s -261.18 current US$ per square kilometre 137.34 current US$ per square kilometre 398.53 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s -60 current US$ per square kilometre 99.9 current US$ per square kilometre 159.91 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Jamaica or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at -18.96 current US$ per square kilometre against -57.15 current US$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Jamaica and Pakistan?
38.19 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Pakistan?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Pakistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Jamaica ranks 164th and Pakistan ranks 162nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/pakistan/">Jamaica vs Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.