Least developed countries vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Least developed countries
153.35 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Moldova
1,130 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
17th
Moldova rank
17th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Moldova
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k197019962023

How they compare

Moldova currently reports 1,130 current US$ per square kilometre against 153.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 976.65 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Moldova's figure about 7.4 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 17th and Moldova ranks 17th of 45 groups.

Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 46.11 current US$ per square kilometre 78.7 current US$ per square kilometre 32.59 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2000s 64.61 current US$ per square kilometre 195.22 current US$ per square kilometre 130.61 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2010s 108.73 current US$ per square kilometre 382.23 current US$ per square kilometre 273.5 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova
2020s 167.82 current US$ per square kilometre 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre 876.5 current US$ per square kilometre Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Least developed countries or Moldova?
Moldova, at 1,130 current US$ per square kilometre against 153.35 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Least developed countries and Moldova?
976.65 current US$ per square kilometre, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Moldova rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Least developed countries ranks 17th and Moldova ranks 17th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/moldova/">Least developed countries vs Moldova: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.