Liberia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Liberia
264.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
10.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Liberia rank
41st
OECD members rank
42nd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Liberia
  • OECD members
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 264.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.97 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 253.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Liberia's figure about 24.1 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Liberia ahead.

Liberia ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 42nd of 171 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 39.03 current US$ per square kilometre 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre 34.69 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 114.21 current US$ per square kilometre 7.57 current US$ per square kilometre 106.64 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 82.21 current US$ per square kilometre 19.1 current US$ per square kilometre 63.11 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 362.14 current US$ per square kilometre 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre 359.65 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 433.43 current US$ per square kilometre 17.66 current US$ per square kilometre 415.77 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 319.43 current US$ per square kilometre 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre 302.35 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Liberia or OECD members?
Liberia, at 264.26 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.97 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Liberia and OECD members?
253.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and OECD members?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2022.
How do Liberia and OECD members rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Liberia ranks 41st and OECD members ranks 42nd of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/liberia/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/liberia/oecd-members/">Liberia vs OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.