Low income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Low income
188.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
1,615 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income rank
12th
Maldives rank
11th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Low income
  • Maldives
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 1,615 current US$ per square kilometre against 188.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 1,426 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Maldives's figure about 8.6 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Maldives ahead.

Low income ranks 12th and Maldives ranks 11th of 45 groups.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low income Maldives Difference Ahead
1970s 18.48 current US$ per square kilometre 113.33 current US$ per square kilometre 94.85 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 37.18 current US$ per square kilometre 2,067 current US$ per square kilometre 2,029 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 49.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1,747 current US$ per square kilometre 1,697 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 58.46 current US$ per square kilometre 407.41 current US$ per square kilometre 348.95 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 138.1 current US$ per square kilometre 1,726 current US$ per square kilometre 1,588 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 209.97 current US$ per square kilometre 1,551 current US$ per square kilometre 1,341 current US$ per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Low income or Maldives?
Maldives, at 1,615 current US$ per square kilometre against 188.78 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Low income and Maldives?
1,426 current US$ per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Maldives?
48 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Low income and Maldives rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Low income ranks 12th and Maldives ranks 11th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-income/maldives/">Low income vs Maldives: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.