Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

Malawi
656.55 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
517.12 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
26th
Uganda rank
28th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • Malawi
  • Uganda
02505007501.0k196219922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 656.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 517.12 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 139.43 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Uganda ahead.

Malawi ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 28th of 171 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 11.56 current US$ per square kilometre 9.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 70.35 current US$ per square kilometre 13.68 current US$ per square kilometre 56.68 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 233.04 current US$ per square kilometre 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre 180 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 406.3 current US$ per square kilometre 175.64 current US$ per square kilometre 230.66 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 272.25 current US$ per square kilometre 202.78 current US$ per square kilometre 69.48 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 486.24 current US$ per square kilometre 253.5 current US$ per square kilometre 232.74 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 863.91 current US$ per square kilometre 382.14 current US$ per square kilometre 481.78 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, Malawi or Uganda?
Malawi, at 656.55 current US$ per square kilometre against 517.12 current US$ per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between Malawi and Uganda?
139.43 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Uganda?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
Malawi ranks 26th and Uganda ranks 28th of 171 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/uganda/">Malawi vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
218 places, 10,238 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.