East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Zambia
0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
40th
Zambia rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Zambia
00.010.020.030.040.05196019912023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 95.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was East Asia & Pacific ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th and Zambia ranks 40th of 45 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1970s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0027 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0101 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.01 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.023 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0229 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0144 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0144 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2010s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0014 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2020s 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0023 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0022 current US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
0.0018 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 40th and Zambia ranks 40th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-germany-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
216 places, 10,000 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.