Bhutan vs Chile: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Bhutan
20,000 current US$
in 2000
Chile
17,625 current US$
in 2017
Bhutan rank
105th
Chile rank
107th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Bhutan
- Chile
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 20,000 current US$ against 17,625 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 2,375 current US$.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 105th and Chile ranks 107th of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22,000 current US$ | 15,000 current US$ | 7,000 current US$ | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 20,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Bhutan or Chile?
- Bhutan, at 20,000 current US$ against 17,625 current US$ in Chile as of 2000.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Bhutan and Chile?
- 2,375 current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Chile?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2000.
- How do Bhutan and Chile rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Bhutan ranks 105th and Chile ranks 107th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.