Chile vs Togo: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Chile
17,625 current US$
in 2017
Togo
15,564 current US$
in 2022
Chile rank
107th
Togo rank
110th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Chile
- Togo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 17,625 current US$ against 15,564 current US$ in Togo, a difference of 2,061 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 107th and Togo ranks 110th of 129 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 218,750 current US$ | 206,250 current US$ | 12,500 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 155,875 current US$ | 92,964 current US$ | 62,911 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Chile or Togo?
- Chile, at 17,625 current US$ against 15,564 current US$ in Togo as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Chile and Togo?
- 2,061 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Togo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Togo rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Chile ranks 107th and Togo ranks 110th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.