China vs Poland: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
China
35,361 current US$
in 2023
Poland
40,000 current US$
in 2000
China rank
96th
Poland rank
94th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- China
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 40,000 current US$ against 35,361 current US$ in China, a difference of 4,639 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
China ranks 96th and Poland ranks 94th of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 230,000 current US$ | 296,000 current US$ | 66,000 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 400,000 current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 360,000 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, China or Poland?
- Poland, at 40,000 current US$ against 35,361 current US$ in China as of 2000.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between China and Poland?
- 4,639 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2000.
- How do China and Poland rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- China ranks 96th and Poland ranks 94th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.