Congo vs Uzbekistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Congo
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 28,404 current US$ against 27,001 current US$ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 1,403 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 101st of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 355,000 current US$ | 75,000 current US$ | 280,000 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 19,584 current US$ | 32,494 current US$ | 12,910 current US$ | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Congo or Uzbekistan?
- Congo, at 28,404 current US$ against 27,001 current US$ in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 1,403 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uzbekistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Uzbekistan rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Congo ranks 98th and Uzbekistan ranks 101st of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.