Eswatini vs Tunisia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Eswatini
14,392 current US$
in 2019
Tunisia
14,487 current US$
in 2021
Eswatini rank
113th
Tunisia rank
112th
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Eswatini
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 14,487 current US$ against 14,392 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 95 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 129 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96,250 current US$ | 11,875 current US$ | 84,375 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 52,127 current US$ | 11,938 current US$ | 40,189 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Eswatini or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 14,487 current US$ against 14,392 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2021.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Eswatini and Tunisia?
- 95 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini and Tunisia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 113th and Tunisia ranks 112th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.