Euro area vs Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Euro area
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 1.53 million current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Euro area, a difference of 1.51 million current US$.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 76.4 times Euro area's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Euro area ranks 45th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 46 groups.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Euro area | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73,750 current US$ | 250,000 current US$ | 176,250 current US$ | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 50,000 current US$ | 485,000 current US$ | 435,000 current US$ | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Euro area or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 1.53 million current US$ against 20,000 current US$ in Euro area as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Euro area and Nicaragua?
- 1.51 million current US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Euro area and Nicaragua?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2003.
- How do Euro area and Nicaragua rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Euro area ranks 45th and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.