Poland vs Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps over time
- Poland
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Poland currently reports 40,000 current US$ against 29,317 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 10,683 current US$.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.4 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 97th of 129 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 296,000 current US$ | 56,333 current US$ | 239,667 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 40,000 current US$ | 46,667 current US$ | 6,667 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps, Poland or Sri Lanka?
- Poland, at 40,000 current US$ against 29,317 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2000.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps between Poland and Sri Lanka?
- 10,683 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2000.
- How do Poland and Sri Lanka rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), gaps?
- Poland ranks 94th and Sri Lanka ranks 97th of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) with 358 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.