Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.1406 current US$ per person
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.7048 current US$ per person
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
14th
Zimbabwe rank
14th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Zimbabwe
00.250.50.7511.2198120022023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.7048 current US$ per person against 0.1406 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.5642 current US$ per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.0 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 46 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0039 current US$ per person 0.125 current US$ per person 0.1211 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0113 current US$ per person 0.543 current US$ per person 0.5317 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0096 current US$ per person 0.5637 current US$ per person 0.5541 current US$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.055 current US$ per person 0.6898 current US$ per person 0.6348 current US$ per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.7048 current US$ per person against 0.1406 current US$ per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Zimbabwe?
0.5642 current US$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2022.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Zimbabwe rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th and Zimbabwe ranks 14th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/zimbabwe/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Zimbabwe: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 5,301 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.