Bangladesh vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Bangladesh
22.79 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
30.17 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
22nd
Gambia rank
20th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Gambia
020406080197519992023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 30.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 7.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.3 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Gambia ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Gambia ranks 20th of 128 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.3265 current US$ per square kilometre 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.9219 current US$ per square kilometre 4.64 current US$ per square kilometre 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 5.45 current US$ per square kilometre 40.32 current US$ per square kilometre 34.86 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 16.81 current US$ per square kilometre 34.88 current US$ per square kilometre 18.07 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 15.09 current US$ per square kilometre 13.11 current US$ per square kilometre 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 21.65 current US$ per square kilometre 15.31 current US$ per square kilometre 6.34 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Bangladesh or Gambia?
Gambia, at 30.17 current US$ per square kilometre against 22.79 current US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Bangladesh and Gambia?
7.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Gambia?
46 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Gambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Bangladesh ranks 22nd and Gambia ranks 20th of 128 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/gambia-the/">Bangladesh vs Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.