Early-demographic dividend vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Early-demographic dividend
3.38 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guatemala
21.75 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
22nd
Guatemala rank
24th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Guatemala
0510152025197419982023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 21.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 18.37 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 6.4 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Guatemala ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Guatemala ranks 24th of 46 groups.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4146 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre 10 current US$ per square kilometre 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre 12.14 current US$ per square kilometre 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre 15.01 current US$ per square kilometre 11.46 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Early-demographic dividend or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 21.75 current US$ per square kilometre against 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Early-demographic dividend and Guatemala?
18.37 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Guatemala?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Guatemala rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 22nd and Guatemala ranks 24th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/guatemala/">Early-demographic dividend vs Guatemala: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.