East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

East Asia & Pacific
0.6891 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
10.07 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
38th
Zambia rank
40th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Zambia
0204060197419982023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 10.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.6891 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 9.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 14.6 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Zambia ranks 40th of 46 groups.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3013 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3007 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0052 current US$ per square kilometre 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre 2.62 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0841 current US$ per square kilometre 9.02 current US$ per square kilometre 8.94 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.9406 current US$ per square kilometre 35.45 current US$ per square kilometre 34.51 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.9092 current US$ per square kilometre 26.52 current US$ per square kilometre 25.61 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.6239 current US$ per square kilometre 8.85 current US$ per square kilometre 8.23 current US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, East Asia & Pacific or Zambia?
Zambia, at 10.07 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.6891 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
9.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Zambia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Zambia ranks 40th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/zambia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Zambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.