Europe & Central Asia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Europe & Central Asia
1.47 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
15.64 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
30th
Guinea-Bissau rank
29th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Guinea-Bissau
051015197419982023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 14.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 10.7 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 30th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 29th of 46 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1032 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7112 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6081 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.2497 current US$ per square kilometre 12.45 current US$ per square kilometre 12.2 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.1954 current US$ per square kilometre 10.34 current US$ per square kilometre 10.15 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre 12.78 current US$ per square kilometre 11.72 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Europe & Central Asia or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre against 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Europe & Central Asia and Guinea-Bissau?
14.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Guinea-Bissau?
15 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 30th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 29th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/guinea-bissau/">Europe & Central Asia vs Guinea-Bissau: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.