IDA & IBRD total vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland … Ireland square

IDA & IBRD total
4.24 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Tanzania
30.41 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA & IBRD total rank
21st
Tanzania rank
19th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland … Ireland square over time

  • IDA & IBRD total
  • Tanzania
020406080197419982023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 30.41 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 26.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 7.2 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 19th of 46 groups.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA & IBRD total Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0248 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3274 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3026 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.1547 current US$ per square kilometre 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre 2.44 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.6551 current US$ per square kilometre 9.42 current US$ per square kilometre 8.76 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2000s 4 current US$ per square kilometre 40.95 current US$ per square kilometre 36.95 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2010s 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre 40.3 current US$ per square kilometre 36.39 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre 30.92 current US$ per square kilometre 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, IDA & IBRD total or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 30.41 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.24 current US$ per square kilometre in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between IDA & IBRD total and Tanzania?
26.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and Tanzania?
48 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2022.
How do IDA & IBRD total and Tanzania rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
IDA & IBRD total ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 19th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-and-ibrd-total/tanzania/">IDA & IBRD total vs Tanzania: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.