Low & middle income vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Low & middle income
26.95 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
272.53 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income rank
1st
Malawi rank
4th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Malawi
0100200300197419982023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 272.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 26.95 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 245.58 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 10.1 times Low & middle income's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Low & middle income ahead.

Low & middle income ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 0.2928 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2298 current US$ per square kilometre 0.063 current US$ per square kilometre Low & middle income
1990s 0.9307 current US$ per square kilometre 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 5.98 current US$ per square kilometre 89.35 current US$ per square kilometre 83.38 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre 252.4 current US$ per square kilometre 246.21 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 15.81 current US$ per square kilometre 248.6 current US$ per square kilometre 232.79 current US$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Low & middle income or Malawi?
Malawi, at 272.53 current US$ per square kilometre against 26.95 current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Low & middle income and Malawi?
245.58 current US$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Malawi?
40 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Low & middle income and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Low & middle income ranks 1st and Malawi ranks 4th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/low-and-middle-income/malawi/">Low & middle income vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.