Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Sub-Saharan Africa
12.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
109.78 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
10th
Uganda rank
7th

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Uganda
0100200300400197419982023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 109.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 97.69 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Uganda's figure about 9.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 7th of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sub-Saharan Africa averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Uganda Difference Ahead
1980s 0.616 current US$ per square kilometre 0.4147 current US$ per square kilometre 0.2014 current US$ per square kilometre Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 2.49 current US$ per square kilometre 21.81 current US$ per square kilometre 19.32 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 15.11 current US$ per square kilometre 241.28 current US$ per square kilometre 226.17 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 13.6 current US$ per square kilometre 175.31 current US$ per square kilometre 161.71 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 11.91 current US$ per square kilometre 127.59 current US$ per square kilometre 115.68 current US$ per square kilometre Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Sub-Saharan Africa or Uganda?
Uganda, at 109.78 current US$ per square kilometre against 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uganda?
97.69 current US$ per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uganda?
41 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uganda rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 10th and Uganda ranks 7th of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sub-saharan-africa/uganda/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uganda: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 5,232 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.