Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per

Least developed countries
0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Malawi
0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
4th
Malawi rank
3rd

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Malawi
00.0010.0020.003197419982023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 10.3 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Least developed countries ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 4th and Malawi ranks 3rd of 46 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Malawi Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
1990s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2000s 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0013 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2010s 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0026 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0022 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi
2020s 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per, Least developed countries or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.0019 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per between Least developed countries and Malawi?
0.0017 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Malawi?
39 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2022.
How do Least developed countries and Malawi rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, ireland (current us$), per?
Least developed countries ranks 4th and Malawi ranks 3rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-ireland-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/malawi/">Least developed countries vs Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 5,204 data points, 1974–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.