Angola vs Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps
Angola
842,610 current US$
in 2023
Latvia
820,000 current US$
in 2003
Angola rank
79th
Latvia rank
81st
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps over time
- Angola
- Latvia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 842,610 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 22,610 current US$.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 81st of 154 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.21 million current US$ | 797,500 current US$ | 20.41 million current US$ | Angola |
| 2000s | 13.56 million current US$ | 318,750 current US$ | 13.25 million current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps, Angola or Latvia?
- Angola, at 842,610 current US$ against 820,000 current US$ in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps between Angola and Latvia?
- 22,610 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2003.
- How do Angola and Latvia rank globally for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, italy (current us$), gaps?
- Angola ranks 79th and Latvia ranks 81st of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$) with 495 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.